Reflections from the Executive Director

Part of a Series

This Reflection is a part of the 2017 Public Safety Summit Report.

To see the complete report, click here.

What is the linkage between organizational capacity and culture? Why does it matter? And what, if anything, can leaders in public safety do about it?

To answer these questions, first take a look at the changing landscape of policing. The volume and velocity of change is staggering. Society is expecting new forms of outcomes, and communities are demanding more from front-line police. In fact, 75 percent of the attendees at the Public Safety Summit said they are anticipating significant or extreme change in their operating environment within the next five years.

Keeping up with this level of change will require public safety organizations to increase organizational capacity – the structures, systems, processes, and people that enable an organization to meet goals effectively and efficiently. Indeed, most chiefs, sheriffs, and commissioners are already focused like a laser on this issue. Of the attendees at the Summit, 54 percent said that growing capacity is “critical” – meaning it’s the most important challenge they face.

Yet here’s the important linkage between organizational capacity and culture. In almost every setting, organizational culture can overpower and suppress capacity-growing innovations. As the noted organizational theorist Peter Drucker said; “culture eats strategy for breakfast.” In public safety organizations, this tension between organizational culture and strategic innovation is even more pronounced, as leaders have long-standing cultures – often generations in the making – that can accept or reject operating model changes and innovations, along with the new ways of working that come with them. All too often, cultural issues thwart the power and potential of innovation.

So what, if anything, can be done about this challenge of culture and capacity?

Gaining a deeper and more nuanced understanding of what underpins the challenge will help. Organizational culture, as Edgar Schein of MIT defines it, is “a pattern of shared basic assumptions that the group learned as it solved its problems of external adaptation and internal integration, that has worked well enough to be considered valid and, therefore, to be taught to new members as the correct way to perceive, think, and feel in relation to those problems.” Two ideas are notable here. One is that groups of people are always creating and acquiring new ways of working in order to adapt to the world (the external adaptation and internal integration element). A second is that successfully adapting to the world requires a group to teach each other and show each other new ways of working. The group has to collectively change the culture over time. There is no “instant fix” to harmonize culture and capacity – it demands concerted and continuous engagement.

You can start this concerted and continuous engagement by reflecting on three questions:

Of course reflection is nothing without action. And this isn’t an easy task. Seventy-seven percent of the leaders at the Summit said it was “critical” to harmonize organizational capacity and culture, yet only ten percent said they are “well prepared” for this challenge.

Even with the difficulty, there are strong examples to look to and emulate. As the cases and insights from this report show, progressive chiefs and sheriffs are finding ways to innovate, build new operating models, and harmonize capacity and culture.

My sincere hope is that the Public Safety Summit will spur the dialogue and ideas that help public safety leaders adapt organizational cultures and build the capacity that leads to better justice, value, trust, and legitimacy over time.

Let’s get to work,


Dr. Antonio M. Oftelie
Executive Director, Leadership for a Networked World
Fellow, Technology and Entrepreneurship Center at Harvard
Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences
Producttags : Nike Trainers

Latest Insights

CFOs today must embrace ceaseless change. The average company in the S&P 500 will be on that list for just 12 years by 2027. That is half of what it was in 2012, and about one-third of what it was in 1964. The downward trend line is unmistakable. Darwin was right, as Perfetti observes....

Having spent more than a decade studying rebels in unexpected places, Tandon Family Professor of Business Administration at Harvard Business School...

When James O’Neill became the Police Commissioner of New York City in 2016, the department was in the midst of significant change. During the...

As CFOs and financial executives at the Summit have reflected on their role in the world, they’re experiencing profound change now, as well as seeing...


Hosted by

Leadership for a Networked World’s applied research, student innovation challenge, and on-campus summit programs are an initiative of Dr. Antonio M. Oftelie, Innovation Fellow at the Technology and Entrepreneurship Center at Harvard (TECH), part of the Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences. TECH is a hub for students, faculty, alumni, and government and industry leaders to learn together, collaborate, and innovate. LNW accelerates these efforts by connecting leaders across sectors and developing cutting-edge thought leadership on innovation and organizational transformation.

© 2020 Leadership for a Networked World. All Rights Reserved.